Skip to content

Hadith Sources and Methodology

This page explains how narrations get onto this site, how their gradings are handled, and what to do when you find one graded differently elsewhere.

How a narration is selected

A narration is included only when three things are true. Its collection and hadith number can be identified. Its text is a rendering of the narration rather than a paraphrase circulating as a quotation. And its grading is either well established or can be described honestly as disputed. If any of the three fails, the item is left out rather than published with a plausible-looking citation attached to it.

Popularity is not a criterion. A narration does not earn a place here because it appears on other Ramadan websites, on social media images, or in a widely shared list. Several of the most-shared Ramadan “hadith” have no sound chain at all.

How references are displayed

  • The collection is named in full — Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawud, Jami‘ at-Tirmidhi, Sunan an-Nasa’i, Sunan Ibn Majah, and so on.
  • The hadith number follows the numbering most readers will be able to check in a common online index. Printed editions number differently, so a number that does not match your copy is not necessarily an error — but tell us anyway and we will note both.
  • Where the same narration appears in a second collection, that parallel is shown too. Two independent references are more useful than one.
  • The narrating companion is named where the narration identifies one.
  • The Arabic is shown only where we hold it with confidence. An approximated Arabic text presented as the wording of a narration would be a fabrication even when the meaning is right, so the field is left empty instead.

How grading is handled

Every card shows a grading, and the grading is never omitted to make a narration look stronger than it is.

  • Sahih — authentic. Narrations from Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim carry this by the standing of those two collections; elsewhere it reflects an established grading.
  • Hasan — sound, a grade below sahih, and acceptable as evidence in the ordinary run of things.
  • Da‘if — weak. A weak narration is labelled weak on its own card. It is not deleted where it is widely circulated, because a reader who meets it elsewhere is better served by finding it here with the problem named than by finding nothing.
  • Graded differently by scholars — where there is a real difference of assessment, the card says so and names the issue rather than picking a side.

Fabricated narrations are not published at all, except where the misattribution itself is the point being made.

When a narration is disputed

Hadith criticism is a discipline with its own methods, and specialists have reached different conclusions about particular chains for a very long time. A difference between two qualified gradings is not a mistake by one of them.

If you find a narration on this site graded differently by a scholar you follow, the practical answer is the ordinary one: follow the scholarship you trust, and treat what is written here as a pointer to the source rather than as a verdict. This site does not grade hadith itself. It reports established gradings and says when they conflict.

What is kept out

  • Qur’an verses. They are cited by surah and verse across the site and are never mixed into the hadith bank.
  • Statements of scholars and general Islamic sayings, which are not narrations from the Prophet.
  • Anything whose source cannot be traced to a collection.

Reporting a problem

A wrong number, a text that is not in the cited source, or a grading stated too confidently is worth reporting. The Corrections page explains what to send. A correction that names the collection and number you checked gets acted on quickly.

Published Reviewed against the standards in our editorial policy.